From Bo Astrup, the Historic Highlands neighborhood blog has taken a stand against the proposed cell tower at St. Elizabeth's.
« It’s coming! | Main | Large brawl at Allen and Atchison reported »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83455629c69e2010536228506970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Historic Highlands comes out against cell tower:
Lisa Hastings said…
It’s a done deal. The commission will approve the project because their staff has recommended approval and found nothing about the project that would be inconsistent with Altadena’s general plan which requires all projects to to be compatible with Altadena’s unique character. What a joke and a sham.
Here is the link to the documents:
http://planning.lacounty.gov/doc/case/project_r2006-02294_rpc-package.pdf
If you review other projects reviewed by the planning commission, just about anything goes except projects that attract proven prostitution and drug activity.
Tuesday, November 25, 2008 at 02:24 PM
susan c said…
I live in an area of Altadena with almost no cell phone coverage at home, so I’m grateful that another cell tower is being installed close to home. It’s easy for the good folks of Historic Highlands to oppose the tower because they live in an area with adequate cell phone coverage.
Tuesday, November 25, 2008 at 04:41 PM
Steve Gerow said…
I live on Loma Alta near Porter, where we have lousy cell coverage and am in favor of cell towers across Altadena to bring coverage up to the mountains.
I especially like the towers disguised as faux palms.
Tuesday, November 25, 2008 at 05:43 PM
Steve Escovar said…
With regard to cell coverage in Altadena, the cell phone service providers can place antennas on utility poles in order to improve coverage in difficult to reach areas such as foothills and canyons. For example, at the intersection of Altadena Dr. and Fair Oaks,you can see cell antennas placed on a telephone pole. I believe this is a better approach to servicing local cell phone users because the antennas are closer to “coverage gaps” and they present no intrusion to aesthetics of the area. This is unlike the detrimental impact of a 56 foot tower near the St. Elizabeth church tower which was designed by noted architect Wallace Neff and which is in essence the gateway to Altadena. Those opposed to the cell tower at St. Elizabeth are advocating for a well planed use of utility pole antennas to fill any coverage gaps while still “Keeping Altadena Beautiful” We would appreciate if any comments to the Regional Planning Commission would include a request for utility pole antenna placement instead of a 56 foot cell tower which would only service an eight block radius. Thanks for reading and thanks for your support.
Steve Escovar
Wednesday, November 26, 2008 at 03:52 PM
Christina R. Escovar said…
Thank you to Historic Highlands, the Altadena Town Council, Altadena Heritage, Wallace Neff Jr. and over 500 petitioners who believe that our voice can and will make a difference on December 3, 2008. The public comment portion of the hearing is designed so that the community can be heard. In the Staff Analysis of the previously mentioned report, the recommendation is, “. . .subject to change based on testimony and /or documentary evidence presented at the public hearing:.”
I urge all those who feel they need additional cell phone coverage to ask for utility poll placement by their respective carriers. Coverage can be achieved without negatively impacting the welfare of the community and preserving a historically significant Church and Oak Tree.
Wednesday, November 26, 2008 at 07:32 PM
Lisa said…
So what happened at the hearing?
Wednesday, December 03, 2008 at 07:53 PM