« Pasadena Unified school board candidates talk budget at forum | Main | Webster’s Community Pharmacy to hold flu shot clinic Saturday »

Friday, January 11, 2013

 

Date

Los Angeles County Clean Water, Clean Beaches Measure Protest LetterExecutive Officer of the Board of Supervisors
P.O. Box 866006
Los Angeles, CA 90086

Gentlemen:

X  I protest the proposed clean water fee.

Assessor’s Parcel Number:      xxxx-xxx-xxx
Parcel Address:    Street Address  
Altadena, CA 91001

I am not opposed to the concept of this measure, or to a fee supporting its goals. However, I protest it because it is inadequately thought out and provides few details on how, and no assurance of when, cleaner water and beaches will be achieved. It lacks accountability and doesn’t explain how programs (or those implementing them) will be chosen and overseen. The process of how property will be asessed is not transparent. More developed proposals need to be presented regarding:

  • Watershed authority groups receiving 50% of the funds. What would their legal structure and governance be?
  • Needs identification.  The Engineer’s Report refers to an “overall needs assessment utilizing the collective findings of several independent studies and evaluations of various segments of the storm water infrastructure within the District,” and lists those studies.  But, no synthesis or summary is provided, other than a statement on page 26 that “the cost … will most certainly far exceed the revenues being proposed” of the  $296,730,000 annually. Such sloppy accounting to citizens being asked to pay infers only that someone thought $300 million sounded about right, and that the county will ask for more later.
  • Criteria for project selection. While lists of possible eligible projects are provided, no idea as to how these would be prioritized or rated is given. Will the majority of funds go to street sweepers or to groundwater recharge basins?  Or something else — like city staff, consultants, and more studies?  Cities need leeway to decide which projects make sense, but policy guidance and an accountability mechanism for the proposed watershed authority groups is needed.
  • Longevity of the measure.  While the task is large and solutions uncertain, there should be an established time limit, such as 10, 15, or 20 years.

Print Name ______________________________   Sign Name_____________________________

 

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83455629c69e2017c359a319c970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference “Clean Water, Clean Beaches” measure protests must be in Tuesday:

Comments