« Town council rundown | Main | Council tables look at 9/11 monument »

Wednesday, June 22, 2011

Several residents raised objections to the plan during the public comment.  Lori Paul said that, even if the Johnson Field plan was used, it actually meant 20 truck trips a day going down Windsor, as each empty truck returned to be reloaded.   She also said that dumping the silt in an area on the southeast corner of the dam avoided transporting the silt away from the dam and then back again to Johnson Field on the other side.

Objections were also raised to any use of Windsor, as it is one of the main roads to the Jet Propulsion Laboratory and the only route some residents on the side streets can use  to leave their homes.  

As for Johnson Field, some speakers objected to the site as it hosts a population of frogs.

Council chairman Gino Sund said that the council’s concern was trying to avoid having trucks going down Windsor for the estimated three or four week life of the “little dig.”  The alternative routes, in the short term, simply won’t work, Sund said.  The council wants to see if Johnson Field is a viable alternative, and “we don’t know that,” Sund said.  “The problem is timing — we don’t have that many options available to us.”

Shackelford said that “We have a challenge with all those trucks coming up on Windsor — if we can get it down to ten trucks, we won’t be happy, but we can accept it.”

 

 

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83455629c69e2014e89508071970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Town council wants Pasadena site for Devil’s Gate cleanout:

Comments