« Sheriff’s share gang information | Main | Economic woes hit close to home »


Thursday, March 27, 2008


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83455629c69e200e55179dc478833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Modernist architecture: not for everybody. Especially in a wheelchair.:

Comments


Library Santa said…

Tim, may Santa call you Tim?

Having spent many hours in the library,as an architect specializing in access and as a member of the construction committee, I can assure you that its members are sensitive to the building and its need to become accessible. We are also aware of its present operational limitations. The board is responsible for maintaining our communities most valued resource and extending its useful life.

Good architecture is more than just dynamic elevations and interior spaces. It fails if it does not meet the needs of its intended use. Form should be defined by function. The functional requirements of todays libraries and users differ significantly from the 60’s.

Yes, our building is wonderfully sited, however it is inaccessable. This can and will be sensitively addressed. Interior improvements will also address this issue while complimenting the buildings interior spaces. CWA, the chosen architect, excels at community sensitive design.

I challenge those who speak with out having particapated in the process to date, to join with us at community meetings during design development. Let the critics speak by participating with us in the process. Lets see just how thick their skin is.


Altadenablog said…

Thank you, Library Santa!

(And it’s Timothy.)

I’m sure if you re-read the editorial, you’ll agree that it’s aimed more at Larry Wilson’s paean to modernist architecture in public buildings. I’m criticizing him as a USER of this modernist architecture, i.e. a library patron who requires a stroller and who may have to transport someone in a wheelchair eventually, and someone whose child was shut out of the neighborhood school due to accessibility issues. What he saw as aesthetically pleasing I saw as barriers to full participation in the services of community buildings I am helping to pay for.

I’m pleased to see that accessibility issues in the library are being addressed; I’m also encouraged that you agree with the editorial that the library is presently inaccessible.

I’m puzzled by your last paragraph, and who it’s addressed to. If it’s us, we think we have a right as residents, library users, and people who pay taxes in the library district to criticize deficiencies in library design and relate our real-life experiences. The right to free speech and comment shouldn’t be predicated on attending planning meetings. It should be welcomed as public input on matters to be addressed during design development.

In any event, as often happens in Altadena, planning meetings aren’t well publicized. Altadenablog welcomes any notice of library planning meetings, particularly ones where public participation is sought, and we’ll gladly put the notice on the blog for all to see.

We love the library location and look forward to seeing a redevelopment plan that addresses the need for greater accessibility.


Altadenablog said…

Comments are closed, but the discussion continues here.