Usually, we like PSN’s Larry Wilson a lot, but he’s way off base this time.
Yesterday’s column takes issue with the comment that the Altadena Library building "stinks." Wilson says that the Boyd Georgi 1967 building is a triumph of mid-century modernism:
His library is his masterpiece. With its built-ins, sunken reading area and big skylights, it’s where the megamaniacal villain would have his headquarters if you were shooting a Bond movie on Christmas Tree Lane.
And that’s about the size of it — it’s a villain’s lair. It stinks.
Wilson doesn’t mention that, it addition to its clean lines and water-stained stucco, it’s surrounded by a splintery wooden deck which wasn’t part of the original plan. And why the deck? Because it’s the only way anyone who isn’t in the bloom of health can actually GET INTO THE LIBRARY!
Because the main entrance — over stairs and a steep staircase — is inaccessible to anyone who has children in a stroller or who has limited mobility, i.e. walker or wheelchair. If you’re unfortunate enough to require a wheeled vehicle to move around in — well, you don’t get to enter from the parking lot. You have to make your way to the street side of the building, traverse the splintery deck and use an elevator to bypass the steep staircase. And let’s not talk about how the sunken reading area is basically restricted to those with working legs.
That has always been our problem with modernist architecture. It’s not for everybody. Just for adults and/or the healthy.
We once lived in West Pasadena, and there were quite a few modernist houses in our neighborhood. They were quite beautiful, in their spare clean lines, their balconies and bridges and glass walls that thrust them into the hills and creeksides. But we always left thinking, "I can’t bring my children here, or our friends who need wheelchairs. It’s too dangerous and inaccessible for them."
We have no problems with people’s private homes — they can make them as modernist as they like. We have no problem with differences in aesthetic values. We just knew that that kind of house was not for us, because we enjoy our children and all our friends, including the ones on wheels, and wanted a home that was welcoming for them. Different strokes for different folks, and all that.
But a public building — like a library — needs to be for the public. A library is for everyone, not just those who can climb the steep staircase of Dr. Evil.
A personal note: one of our children has a condition that causes progressive mobility problems. A few years hence, do we tell him that he can’t go in the library with his friends because it will ruin the aesthetic?
Or to school. Wilson also rhapsodizes about Noyes Elementary, another Georgi work, with its flat roofs and glass walls and pavilioned walkways. Back when Noyes was Noyes, before it became a charter school, it was our neighborhood elementary school — and one, we and PUSD agreed, that our child could not go to, because it sits on multiple levels.
No, modernist architecture isn’t for everybody. But libraries and schools are. They need to be designed accordingly. The Altadena Library falls short, and needs to be radically renovated or replaced.


Library Santa said…
Tim, may Santa call you Tim?
Having spent many hours in the library,as an architect specializing in access and as a member of the construction committee, I can assure you that its members are sensitive to the building and its need to become accessible. We are also aware of its present operational limitations. The board is responsible for maintaining our communities most valued resource and extending its useful life.
Good architecture is more than just dynamic elevations and interior spaces. It fails if it does not meet the needs of its intended use. Form should be defined by function. The functional requirements of todays libraries and users differ significantly from the 60’s.
Yes, our building is wonderfully sited, however it is inaccessable. This can and will be sensitively addressed. Interior improvements will also address this issue while complimenting the buildings interior spaces. CWA, the chosen architect, excels at community sensitive design.
I challenge those who speak with out having particapated in the process to date, to join with us at community meetings during design development. Let the critics speak by participating with us in the process. Lets see just how thick their skin is.
Thursday, March 27, 2008 at 11:11 PM
Altadenablog said…
Thank you, Library Santa!
(And it’s Timothy.)
I’m sure if you re-read the editorial, you’ll agree that it’s aimed more at Larry Wilson’s paean to modernist architecture in public buildings. I’m criticizing him as a USER of this modernist architecture, i.e. a library patron who requires a stroller and who may have to transport someone in a wheelchair eventually, and someone whose child was shut out of the neighborhood school due to accessibility issues. What he saw as aesthetically pleasing I saw as barriers to full participation in the services of community buildings I am helping to pay for.
I’m pleased to see that accessibility issues in the library are being addressed; I’m also encouraged that you agree with the editorial that the library is presently inaccessible.
I’m puzzled by your last paragraph, and who it’s addressed to. If it’s us, we think we have a right as residents, library users, and people who pay taxes in the library district to criticize deficiencies in library design and relate our real-life experiences. The right to free speech and comment shouldn’t be predicated on attending planning meetings. It should be welcomed as public input on matters to be addressed during design development.
In any event, as often happens in Altadena, planning meetings aren’t well publicized. Altadenablog welcomes any notice of library planning meetings, particularly ones where public participation is sought, and we’ll gladly put the notice on the blog for all to see.
We love the library location and look forward to seeing a redevelopment plan that addresses the need for greater accessibility.
Friday, March 28, 2008 at 08:35 AM
Altadenablog said…
Comments are closed, but the discussion continues here.
Thursday, May 01, 2008 at 09:05 AM